-Indy
In art, mastery of a certain medium is not the only skill that dictates success. Although many of the greatest paintings show hyper-realistic landscapes filled with flowers so faithfully regenerated that one could even smell them, some artists are more recognized for their ideas than for their mastery of the brush. In her article entitled, “Rehabilitating Salvador Dali,” Cristina Carrillo de Albornoz argues the merit of the eccentric Spanish artist. The author argues that because Dali’s personality overshadows many of his works, it is not universally acknowledged that Dali was really a genius light-years ahead of his time and an “extraordinary artist of boundless imagination (with) a great capacity to connect with the collective imagination (Cristina).”
Part of the Dali’s legacy was the way that he influenced artists that came after his time. Because Dali worked in so many fields (painting, literature, drawing, photography, cinema, stage design, and interior design), he had a wide reach that enabled him to meet many successful artists that he would later influence. Andy Warhol would throw parties with Dali and referred to him as ‘master.’ Dali inspired Andy Warhol to pursue the idea of industrialism and the factory. Dali also met and became friends with filmmaker Walt Disney when he went to the United States. Dali’s interests of breaking down barriers between high and low culture, self-promotion as a platform for art, and interest in new technology inspired artists like Andy Warhol, Roy, Lichtenstein, Sigmar Polke, and Jeff Koons (Cristina).But it is hard to see Dali’s genius when it is juxtaposed next to his eccentric personality. As Sevilliano puts it, “For the first time, we are confronted with a multi-faceted personality, a superb artist able to connect with the purest classcism but who joins the Surrealist movement and revolutionizes it (Cristina).” Many claim that Dali’s personality didn’t show the man that he was, and that his exposed frivolous side had a negative effect because it made the public doubt Dali’s seriousness in his craft. But many hold Dali in higher esteem and give him higher historical significance because of his personality. Sevilliano adds, “There are people who collect pictures by Dali and other people who collect hairs from his mustache. Both groups are devotees but we have to analyze Dali by looking at both aspects: the icon who communicates with the masses and the mold-breaking artist (Cristina).”
But as Ms. Aguer says, research and analysis of his work are always changing the public’s interpretation of Dali. The public is developing the idea that Dali was a thinker and one of the few 20th century artists who really knew how to combine an “in-depth knowledge of tradition with an intense commitment to modernity (Cristina).” Although many see Dali’s final works as lazy, unfinished, and lacking substance, Mr. Pixot believes that that end of Dali’s career produced interesting works barely anyone has researched. These final paintings embody the lesson of Dali’s life. Dali’s eccentric personality shouldn’t have a negative effect on Dali’s value as an artist, because Dali’s views on psychoanalysis, science, and religious mysticism redefined the frontiers of art, fashion, and pop culture in ways that we are only beginning to understand. According to Pitxot, Dali’s work is so influential, that “his enormous impact on contemporary art has yet to be fully assessed (Cristina).”
Cristina Carrillo de Albornoz, “Rehabilitating Salvador Dali,” Art Newspaper, Vol. 18, (June 2009) pg. 42-43






